VERMILLION, S.D. -- Dan Jech, Trey Dickerson and Brandon Armstrong each scored 12 points and South Dakota beat NAIA Division II member Presentation College 99-60 on Wednesday night.South Dakota made its first six shots, quickly built a 20-3 lead and held a 47-23 advantage at halftime after holding Presentation to 6-of-26 shooting.Logan Power, who finished with eight points and a career-high 11 rebounds, hit a 3-pointer late in the second half to give South Dakota a 48-point lead.Matt Mooney added 11 points for South Dakota (3-0), and Austin Sparks and Joshua Doss had 10 points apiece. The Coyotes made 53 percent of their shots and outrebounded Presentation 48-31.Its the best start in the Division I era for South Dakota.Aaron Samuels scored 17 points for Presentation, which was held to 33.3 percent shooting. Elijah Valdez added 13 points and Brad Branch 10 for the NAIA Division II school out of Aberdeen, South Dakota. Cheap Jordans Shoes Wholesale . "Jeff is a hard worker who was an important special-teams contributor for us last season," said Stamps GM John Hufnagel. Cheap Nike Air Jordan Retro 13 . The defending champion beat Gael Monfils of France 7-6 (6), 6-3, while second-seeded Andy Murray of Britain dispatched Edouard Roger-Vasselin, also of France, 6-3, 6-3. Making his first appearance since injuring his wrist a month ago, Del Potro had difficulty with his service games in the first set. http://www.jordanscheapchinawholesale.com/ . Vancouver Whitecaps and Toronto FC failed to make the postseason while Montreal Impact fell at the first hurdle losing heavily to Houston Dynamo in the Eastern Conference Knockout Round. Cheap Jordan Retro Shoes For Sale . The No. 1-ranked Nadal tweaked his back warming up for the Australian Open final, which he lost almost four weeks ago in a major upset against Stanislas Wawrinka. His first stop after the layoff is the clay in Rio as he tests the back and tries to stay healthy for the French Open in three months. Cheap Jordans Shoes From China .ca looks back at the stories and moments that made the year memorable. Stokes v Ashwin R Ashwin dismissed Ben Stokes for the fifth time in the series. A batsman should worry if theres a pattern developing in the dismissals. Stokes has a tendency to plant his front foot down the pitch, thats why hes often been away from the line of the ball. The thinking behind the footwork could be to protect the front pad from the straighter ball, but that has caused him to play the wrong line to the delivery that turns away from the left-hand batsman. Most of Stokes dismissals to Ashwin have been when the bowler has come around the stumps, and that line should have dictated that the front foot come slightly across.Moeen against the bouncer Moeen Alis dismissal highlighted the importance of having a defensive technique against the bouncer. The trap had been set and Moeen knew it too, but he was unable to defend or avoid them, and so played into the hands of the Indian fast bowlers. Its almost impossible to hit your way out of a bouncer trap. Moeens dismissal also asked a critical question - why had the Indian quicks bowled only two bouncers at him on the first day?Ishants full lengths On the first day, Ishant Sharma dismissed Keaton Jennings with a full ball. On the second he dismissed Jos Buttler with a full ball. But Ishant bowled only four to five full deliveries in Englands 157.2-over first innings. Either he had success with the full ball because it was a rare surprise or there is a case for him to bowl that length more often. Im tempted to say he should bowl full more often - Ishants height and high-arm action pushes the batsman back and a full ball is likely to cause more trouble.Ishant and Umesh Yadav conceded only three boundaries in front of the stumps. With the lack of llateral movement and pace off the pitch, it is expected that a fair amount of runs will be scored in front of the stumps.dddddddddddd The wagon-wheel, however, suggested that the Indian fast bowlers did not bowl lengths that brought batsmen forward.The difference between Ashwin and Mishra Amit Mishra and Ashwin bowl at a similar pace. Both have accurate pitch maps too. Why is it then, that Ashwin is vastly more effective than Mishra? The reason is fizz off the surface, which is a result of the extra rotations Ashwin puts on the ball. Mishra hasnt been able to put enough behind the ball and is therefore less effective. Without zip off the surface, Mishra is at his best when the batsmen are playing shots, and that explains his success in limited-over formats.Openers let-off by Cook The toughest assignment for opening batsmen is a seaming pitch on the first morning of a Test. The second toughest is opening after having fielded for 150 or more overs. Though conditions on the second day might not be as testing, the fatigue after fielding will challenge physical and mental strength. And there are only ten minutes in which to make the switch. Another thing you have to be wary of is believing the pitch is a featherbed because the other team has batted 150 overs. Every innings starts from scratch, so it was surprising to see the field set by Alastair Cook. For both KL Rahul, struggling for form, and Parthiv Patel, having kept wickets for 157.2 and a part-time opener, Cook had fielders at deep point and deep square leg. With 477 runs in the bank, Cook should have attacked more. ' ' '