Über das Forum » idea of a scaled-down DRS system earlier t

CHENEY, Wash. -- Gage Gubrud threw for 327 yards and four touchdowns, three to Cooper Kupp, and Eastern Washington defeated Montana 35-16 on Saturday.Kupp had eight catches for 140 yards and joined Jacksonville States Josh Barge in pushing their FCS record for consecutive games with a reception to 46. Kendrick Bourne had five receptions for 124 yards.After starting 2 of 9 for 19 yards, Gubrud caught fire. Kupp had TD receptions of 69 and 2 yards for a 21-10 lead at the half. Kupp also completed a 54-yard pass to Gubrud to set up a touchdown.Kupp added a 40-yard score in the third quarter when the Eagles (7-1, 5-0 Big Sky) pushed the lead to 35-10 before Gubrud threw interceptions on consecutive possessions. EWU has outscored opponents 129-34 in the third quarter.Brady Gustafson was 45 of 63 for 398 yards with two touchdowns and two interceptions for the Grizzlies (5-3, 2-3).Eastern Washington averaged 17.3 yards per completion to 8.8 for Montana, which had a 540-455 advantage in total offense.Air Max 97 Wholesale Uk .S District Court against Major League Baseball, the Office of the Commissioner and his own union, the MLBPA. Cheap Nike Air Max Outlet . Takahashi, who had a 10-point lead after the short program, received 268.31 points after the free skate to finish 15 points ahead of second-place Nobunari Oda. http://www.fakeairmaxukoutlet.com/ .C. -- Glenn Howard needed an extra end to move into the Masters Grand Slam of Curling final. Fake Air Max 97 Uk . They had already blown a double-digit lead, fans were hitting the exits, and a long seven-game road trip waited at the end. Cheap Air Max 95 Free Shipping . I cant pinpoint a date, but I do remember a player from my youth. Brian Downing was with the Chicago White Sox at a time when I listened to every game I possibly could on the radio. That particular season the late great Harry Caray was calling the White Sox games.BCCI president Anurag Thakur has said that India is open to agreeing on a revised template for the Decision Review System (DRS) in matches, specifically that they may agree to the use of all non-predictive elements of the system if they can be delinked from Hawk-Eyes projections in lbw decisions.You can have some and leave [Hawk-Eye], Thakur told ESPNcricinfo in Florida during Indias T20 series against West Indies this past weekend. If that comes as an option, we can look into that.When asked specifically if the BCCI would accept the use of visual aids such as Hot Spot and real-time Snicko in addition to the standard camera angles, Thakur nodded in the affirmative. He reiterated the BCCIs longstanding opposition to Hawk-Eye, though, because it is not 100% foolproof.The ICC had commissioned a group of MIT researchers in Boston to do a study of the DRS various mechanisms and report back on their effectiveness. Current India coach Anil Kumble, who heads the ICC cricket committee, was involved in the process, and Thakur said he was able to review the findings in his role on the chief executives committee at the ICC. The findings had not produced anything to sway the BCCI from their firm stance regarding Hawk-Eyes predictive elements, but Thakur said the board is open to discussioons on other parts of the DRS.ddddddddddddI raised this question at that time also, whether it is 100% foolproof? No. Whether changes are required? Yes. When it could be done? MIT was supposed to give a report but they are themselves not much confident that it could be 100% foolproof, Thakur said. Our only issue is whether a technology which is not 100% foolproof, shall we agree that error of judgement is equal with standing umpire and with the technology available? So that is the call we have to take.The BCCI had floated the idea of a scaled-down DRS system earlier this year ahead of the IPL season, but it was passed over at the time. However, Thakur reiterated that it could be tabled again both for domestic and international use in the near future if there is confidence in the other elements of the system that are not related to the predictive path of lbw decisions.I said earlier also that you can have it partially without the lbw decisions, only for the rest of the decisions, Hawk-Eye and the rest of the stuff, Thakur said. But we need to ask ourselves if a machine is making the same error which a human is making, what are we getting out of it? ' ' '